Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Scandalous Goodness

Matthew 20:1-16

September 20, 2026

 

            A favorite movie of mine is A League of Their Own. It tells a fictionalized version of the All-American Girls’ Professional Baseball League. When the US entered World War II, baseball, like so many other occupations, were short of players and of workers. Wanting to keep the game going, mainly for the morale of the country but also for continued profit, league owners hatched a plan to start a women’s league. If Rosie could be a riveter, then why couldn’t Betty be a ball player?

            Although women were told it was their patriotic duty to go to work in the factories and other positions that were traditionally occupied by men, they were not welcomed with open arms. And as the movie conveys, they were not welcomed on the playing fields either. The women’s league was blasted by men and women alike. It was believed that allowing women to play a professional sport would place traditional femininity at stake. The movie depicts the women ballplayers having to endure things that no male player would ever put up with. I’m not talking about harassment. I’m talking about charm lessons and makeovers. The women had chaperones, even though many of them were married. And while the men played in pants, the women had to play in skimpy skirted uniforms.

            Crowds for the games were small, and they were often booed and mocked. They were told that girls can’t play baseball, even though they were playing baseball. But as the movie progresses, the tide begins to turn. The league begins to gain fans and supporters. Crowd size begins to grow. But the tide of the war is also turning. The allies are starting to win. Mr. Harvey, the owner of the movie’s main team, tells his marketing man, Ira Lowenstein, that once the war was over all the girl’s teams would be dismantled. Lowenstein was dismayed. He was the one who pushed for the teams to be taken seriously. He made sure that the women’s talent was highlighted and broadcast.

            When Harvey tells him that the teams will be dismantled, he protests. This is how it will be everywhere, isn’t it? Women were told it was their patriotic duty to go to work, and now they’ll be told to go back to the kitchen. Harvey responds, “You want the boys coming home from war to go into the kitchen?” This is profoundly unfair and Lowenstein knows it, but that is the way of the world.

            But is it the way of the kingdom? Last Sunday we talked about the math of forgiveness. There’s math at play this week too, although it is written more as a word problem than a multiplication challenge. It’s about the last being first and the first being last.

            These words come at the end of our passage, at the end of the parable that is unique to Matthew’s gospel. It is also considered to be one of the most offensive parables in any of the four gospels. In another one of those tricky kingdom parables, Jesus tells the disciples a story that is meant to give them an insight into the workings of God’s realm.

            Jesus says that the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire laborers to work in his vineyard. It was not unusual at that time for day workers to gather in one place with the hopes of being hired. The landowner must know this, so he goes to that place to find the laborers he needs. He contracts with the workers for the usual daily wage of one denarius. This would have given each worker enough money to feed their families for a few days.

            The landowner takes this first round of workers to his vineyard and they get to work. But there must have been a lot of work to be done, because at nine o’clock, the landowner returns to that same place and sees workers who have not been hired and he tells them to go and work in his vineyard and he will pay them whatever is right. They agree and they go. The landowner repeats this process at noon and at three o’clock. At five o'clock, he must have realized that there was more work to be done before they could call it a day, so he goes one more time to the hiring spot. He sees workers standing around and asks them why they aren’t working. Because no one has hired us, they tell him. So, he hires them. They go to the vineyard to finish up the day’s work.

            When the workday is finally finished, the landowner tells his manager to pay all of the workers. But he tells the manager to pay the workers hired last first. The manager does this, and the workers hired last get one denarius each. I can imagine what the workers hired first and then earlier in the day were thinking when they saw this. They were probably giddy with anticipation at the wages they were about to receive. After all, if these guys hired last got a full denarius, then that must mean they would be paid twice that amount, if not more!

            But I suspect that their eagerness turned to shock and then to anger with each group that was paid. Because they were all getting the same amount. The ones hired last were paid exactly what they, the ones hired first, were paid! How dare the landowner pay them the same amount!

            Their anger becomes fury and they go to the landowner to complain. These last guys you hired worked only one hour, but you have paid them the same as us. We worked all day! We bore the sun and the scorching heat on our backs. Why are you paying us all the same?!

            But the landowner seems confused by their anger. He replies,

            “Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for the usual daily wage? Take what belongs to you and go; I choose to give to this last the same as I give to you. Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or are you envious because I am generous?”

            Are you envious because I am generous? Are we envious because God is generous? Are we envious and angry because God shows such scandalous goodness to people we know don’t deserve it? Are we envious because math in God’s kingdom turns everything upside down?

            Think about Jonah. To claim that he is a disgruntled prophet is an understatement. He is so angry and perturbed at the thought that God might show the people of Ninevah even a scant amount of God’s goodness and grace, he willingly disobeys God’s call. God says, Jonah go to Ninevah. And Jonah turns the opposite direction and jumps on a boat bound for Tarshish.

            To be fair to Jonah, Ninevah was the capital city of Assyria, and the Assyrians were brutal. They were enemies of Israel. They sacked Jerusalem. By the world’s standards, Jonah had a right to want the worst for Ninevah. But to God’s standards, it was a different story.

            God is good all the time. All the time God is good. How often do we say that the phrase with joy? But if we’re honest with ourselves, when we say it are we referring only to God’s goodness to us and to the people we love? Do we want to see that same goodness of God given to the people we despise, to the people we think don’t deserve any measure of grace or goodness? Jonah didn’t want to preach to the Ninevites, because if for some strange reason they listened and repented, he knew God would be good to them. He knew God would forgive them. He was well aware of God’s scandalous goodness, and Jonah wanted no part of it.

            Are we envious because God is generous? Are we angry that God’s goodness extends to all of God’s children, and that scandalizes our sense of fair play?

            Another way to translate this sentence, “Are you envious because I am generous?” is “Is your eye evil because I am good?”

            Is your eye evil because I am good?

            I think about this in two ways. The first is that the expression, “the eyes are the window to the soul,” is not just a nice thing to say. My understanding is that it comes from the belief that people could get a glimpse into someone’s soul through their eyes. If someone talks and acts warmly, but their eyes are cold, what do we perceive about them? So, by saying this was Jesus referring to the soul of the people who were angry at the goodness of the landowner? Maybe.

            The second way that I am trying to get my head around this translation is the idea that some cultures put a lot of stock on the evil eye. We can give people the evil eye, and you definitely don’t want the evil eye placed on you. This is something that you might hear about in Greece. My sister talks about the evil eye. If someone put the evil eye on you, it needs to be taken off. Quickly.

            When Brent and I went to Greece two years ago, everything seemed to go wrong on our way there. Our first flight was delayed. We ended up staying overnight in Toronto and lost a full day in Athens. When we finally got to Athens, we waited for two hours while they tried to find my luggage. We finally reunited with my sister and brother-in-law, and then his car broke down on the way to their home. My brother-in-law has the family gift of seeing that an evil eye was put on someone, and apparently someone had gotten to me. He prayed for me, and things got better.

            Is this superstition? Maybe. Is it true? Maybe, maybe not. But whether we can actually put an evil eye on someone or not, I think deep down we all have moments when we want to. Jonah would have gladly put an evil eye on the Ninevites rather than preach God’s mercy to them. He would have preferred death to being called to preach to them. The workers who went to the vineyard first would have put an evil eye on the landowner and the other workers too because they resented the goodness shown to them. Is your eye evil because I am good. Are you envious because I am generous?

            The first shall be last and the last shall be first. Math in the kingdom of heaven turns everything upside down. It upends our sense of who belongs in and who deserves to be out. It throws everything we think we understand about the world off kilter because God wants goodness for all of his children. All of them! And that scandalizes us. That offends us. That makes us angry and resentful against others and against God. But God’s scandalous goodness is the good news of the gospel. God’s scandalous goodness covers us as well. We assume we are the first who will be last, but maybe to someone else, we are the last who will be first. God’s scandalous goodness covers us all, so hard as it is, let’s lay down our resentment and envy and give thanks that the kingdom of heaven is not designed by us but by God. Let us give thanks for God’s scandalous goodness. Thanks be to God.

            Let all of God’s children say, “Alleluia.”

            Amen.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment