Wednesday, March 6, 2024

Zeal -- Third Sunday of Lent

John 2:13-22

March 3, 2024

 

            Did you grow up looking at pictures of Jesus? I know that there are no actual pictures of Jesus, but there are plenty of artistic impressions of him. Did you grow up looking at any of them? There are three specific pictures of Jesus that I remember from my childhood. One was a painting that we had hanging in our living room for as long as I can remember. It was a painting of Jesus talking with two other men, and they are walking on a path, and in the distance, you can see the outline of an ancient city. Without being told this specifically as a child, I knew the one guy was Jesus. I just knew it was. It wasn’t until I was an adult that I realized this was a depiction of the road to Emmaus story from Luke’s gospel. When I was a little kid, it didn’t matter to me what the story was. I just liked to look at Jesus and the two men, and I would trace the path to the city with my finger and imagine the conversation they were having.

            The second picture that I remember must have been one that I saw in Sunday school. It was a picture of Jesus standing outside of a door inset into a stone wall. It looked like a door into a garden. There were vines and flowers growing around it, and Jesus was standing before it, knocking. I was told that the door represented my heart, and Jesus was knocking, asking to be allowed in. See, Jesus is knocking at the door of your heart. Let him in. Whenever I looked at that picture, I vowed that as soon as I heard Jesus knocking on the door of my heart, I would let him in.

            The third picture that I remember may be one that you all remember too. It is a painting of Jesus that is far more famous than I knew until I started doing some research for this sermon. Painted by American artist, Warner Sallman, the painting’s official name is “Head of Christ.” But it is also known as Sallman’s head. It is a picture of Jesus with very pale eyes, light skin, wavy light brown hair, staring off into the distance, looking beatific and perfect and divine. It’s a nice picture. It is a comforting picture. I don’t remember if we had a version of that picture in our home, but I know I saw it in other places. And I remember looking at it and thinking that Jesus looked nice and kind and safe. This picture represented what one commentator called, “a manageable deity.”

            Those are the images of Jesus that I grew up on. There’s nothing inherently wrong with them, other than he doesn’t look like a Middle Eastern Jew in any of them. But they were nice pictures to grow up, and clearly, they sparked my imagination as a child and stuck with me into my adulthood. But those depictions of Jesus seem very far from the Jesus that we read about this morning. This morning we read about a Jesus who gets angry, who is zealous. We read about a Jesus who goes into the temple, makes a whip of cords and begins to drive out all the animals that were gathered there for sacrifice. This is a Jesus, so filled with zeal and righteous anger, that he dumps out the coins of the moneychangers and overturns their tables. He yells at the people selling doves, saying,

            “Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!”

            The Jesus who cleanses the temple – cleansing being a euphemism, like ethnic cleansing – this Jesus does not clean but scatters and crashes and flips and causes chaos. This Jesus seems very far from being a manageable deity, and even further from the Jesus who stood at a door and knocked. This Jesus may not be one we like to consider very often, but here he is. So, this is the Jesus we deal with today.

            Just as we may not quite know how to deal with the Jesus before us today, I can imagine the disciples didn’t know how to deal with him either. I can imagine that they were as shocked by Jesus’ behavior at first like everyone else who witnessed this. They must have looked at each other in alarm, eyes wide, maybe silently mouthing to one another,

“What’s happening?” “Where did this come from?” “Why don’t you try and calm him down?             “Why don’t you try and calm him down?” “I asked you to do it first.”

And so on, and so on. John’s gospel does tell us that the disciples remember that the scripture says, “Zeal for your house will consume me.” Jesus was certainly filled with zeal.

It must be noted that this is a story found in all four gospels. When you come across a story that each of the gospel writers included in their version of Jesus’s life, death, and resurrection, it is a good idea to pay particular attention to the story they all share.

In Matthew, Mark, and Luke, this story comes near the end of the gospel. This is a final act of Jesus, one that contributes mightily to the religious authorities saying,

            “That’s it! Enough with this guy! He’s gotta go!”

            But John puts this story right at the beginning of his gospel. When you read this in the other gospels, Jesus’ anger makes a little more sense. After all, he’s been in public ministry for three years at that point. He’s been preaching, teaching, healing, proclaiming, showing, modeling, and exhorting. Some people got it, but a lot of people didn’t. And part of his anger in the other gospels is that he was protesting a religious system that had become more about exploitation of its weakest members than it was about worship. But why is Jesus angry this early in John? He’s just getting started. He has just left the wedding at Cana where he turned water into wine. Why turn the temple upside down at this moment?

            Well, firstly, the question must be asked, is Jesus more zealous than angry, is his anger fueled by his zeal or is his zeal fueled by his anger? As I said earlier, the scripture that the disciples remembered was that he would be consumed with zeal for his father’s house. Certainly, Jesus is consumed with zeal in this story. And that zeal leads him to overturn the long-standing practices and systems that took place in the temple.

            The moneychangers were there, not to exploit, but to change money. The Law prohibited coins with images on them in the temple. The only coins the people would have been allowed to use outside of the temple would have been Roman. Roman coins bore the image of Caesar on them, so those Roman coins must be exchanged for coins that were lawful in the temple. The great number of animals were in the temple because sacrifices of animals were expected. It was part of  their practice of worship. In order to buy an animal for their required sacrifice, they had to purchase it with an approved coin. What was happening in the temple was what was expected and approved of by the religious authorities and the Law as they all understood it.

            But Jesus comes in and sees this and basically proclaims,

            “You have all missed the point!”

            But he proclaims this with his actions, his unexpected and scandalous actions. So, of course, Jesus is questioned by the religious leaders.

            “What sign can you show us for doing this?”

            And Jesus answers them by not answering them, not directly,

            “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”

            But they don’t get it. The temple has been under construction for forty-six years, but this guy says it can be destroyed and rebuilt in three days?! Sure. Whatever you say, Jesus.

            They missed the point. They could not yet see what was right in front of them, who was right in front of them. They thought the only temple was the one of wood and stone, the place where God lived exclusively. But the temple was flesh and blood and standing in their midst. Jesus was trying to make them understand that God dwelled in him. God was not confined to a building. God had come into flesh and blood, into his flesh and blood, and was loose in the world. God had left the building. And if it took Jesus disrupting the status quo, physically as well as verbally, for them to understand and see this, to believe it, then so be it.

            Jesus was consumed with zeal, with fervor and passion. One commentator called him the Great Disrupter. But his zeal was not about destruction for destruction’s sake, but about tearing down what kept people from full and abundant life in God and building up a new way of living and being as God’s beloved children. His zeal, his anger, his passion was for all to find life, to see and believe that God had left the building but was loose and growing and creating in the world, in him and in them.

            Maybe that is something we need to focus on in this season of Lent. We need to claim the zeal of Jesus as our own. We need to see Jesus in his fullness, not just the calm, safe Jesus of art, but the Jesus who was not afraid of righteous indignation, the Jesus who loved and lived passionately, the Jesus who had zeal and fervor for doing God’s work in the world, the whole world. Maybe it’s okay that Jesus is not a manageable deity. Maybe it’s okay that safety is not what following Jesus is all about. Maybe it’s okay if our status quo is disrupted. Maybe it’s okay if Jesus tears down our expectations and our ideals about how we think things should be. Maybe it's okay because what Jesus is really doing, what God does through Jesus, is creating new life, abundant, verdant, lush life, and inviting us to be a part of it all. Jesus’ zeal is for life. May we be as zealous for life as well.

            Let all of God’s children say, “Amen.”

            Amen.

 

           

No comments:

Post a Comment