Mark 10:35-45
October 20, 2024
A
British television show that I absolutely love is The Vicar of Dibley.
This is a British sitcom from the 1990’s about the first woman vicar to serve
the small and slightly insane English village of Dibley. In the episode that
I’m thinking of, Geri Granger, the vicar, has a sudden rise to fame. Her rise
begins when she is asked to fill in as the last minute guest on a radio show.
She accepts the invitation because she wants to talk about the importance of
getting a nursery school started in the village; a worthwhile and important
project which hopefully media attention will help make happen. But her
performance on the show is hilarious, and she gets the attention,
not the nursery. Geraldine is funny and wacky, much as she is every day, but
this time a much larger group of people hear her. From that first appearance
she’s asked to appear on all sorts of shows.
Originally
Geri promised herself and the church council that her media career would be
temporary, again just a way to get the cause of the nursery school out to the
public. She knows that her place is with her church, not as the BBC’s newest
rising star. But the fame and the attention go to her head. It all culminates
in an interview being done about her in one of the papers. Geri tells the
members of the council that a reporter will be coming to the village to
interview them about her. But it backfires. The story about the vicar gets
forgotten and it instead becomes a profile on the other characters in the show.
They are insulted, humiliated and just plain ridiculed.
It’s
horrible and embarrassing for the vicar and everyone else, and the rest of the
episode is devoted to her willingness to make a public fool out of herself as
an apology. The vicar has a shot at personal glory, and it doesn’t work out so
well. To be fair, Geri did not go seeking glory, it came to her. But once she
gets a taste of that fame, that glory, she can’t let go.
In
our passage from Mark’s gospel, James and John, the sons of Zebedee whom we
first meet when Jesus calls them to be his first disciples, go to Jesus seeking
glory through an intimate, but exclusive relationship with Jesus. One
commentator describes the way they make their request of Jesus as being like a
child to a parent.
“Dad
I want you to do something for me.” And Jesus, like any good parent responds
with, “Tell me what is first.”
“’Teacher,
we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.’ And he said to them, ‘What is
it you want me to do for you?’”
Their
request was that they be allowed to sit at his right hand and his left when he
is in his glory. There’s a sense of kingship and royalty to their request isn’t
there? You get the image in your head of a king on this throne, with his two
most treasured and important advisors on either side of him. I suspect that’s
how James and John viewed Jesus’ glory – a great kingship. And maybe this view
of his kingship would be understandable if Jesus had not spent so much time
telling James, John, and the other ten disciples that he was not the messiah
they thought they wanted. For Jesus, to be the messiah meant pain and suffering
and death, then resurrection.
Now
if James and John had never heard any of this before, we could perhaps
understand why they go to Jesus with their request. But the truth is, they’ve
heard these words from Jesus three times. The third passion prediction happens
in the verses immediately preceding these. Jesus once again pulls the disciples
aside and tells them what is going to happen to him. What’s more, the larger
context of our passage is that they are on their way to Jerusalem. Jesus has
his face set toward the great city, meaning he knows what will happen to him
when he gets there. This makes their request even more audacious and in our
modern parlance, tone deaf.
It
seems that Jesus could plainly tell these disciples a hundred times what is
about to happen to him, what must happen to him, and they still would not get
it. They still misunderstand him, and their misunderstanding seems willful at
this point. I don’t care what Jesus says about his death and resurrection, I am
just going to refuse to understand him.
But
Jesus’ response to James and John does not read like a rebuke. Instead, I hear
compassion in what he says to these two misguided disciples.
“You
do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or
be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?”
James
and John reply with a resolute, “We are able.”
Jesus
replies in the affirmative. Then you will drink this cup, and you will be
baptized with this baptism. But I can’t tell you who will sit at my right or my
left. That’s not my privilege to grant. “It is for those for whom it has been
prepared.”
I
think that Jesus is reminding them that this privilege they seek may only be
granted by God alone.
When
the other ten hear about James and John’s request, they get angry. Clearly they
were offended that James and John would go grabbing for glory and leave them
out of it. What if James and John get the glory and they don’t?! How dare they
try to push to the head of the pack and leave the rest of them hanging in the
wind, on the outside rather than on the inside?!
Jesus
then pulls them all aside, one more time, and tells them that the cup they
think they’ll drink is power and glory and status and rank. But that is the cup
the Gentiles drink, and among the Gentiles, there are tyrants and rulers that hold
all the power, and those tyrants and rulers lord it over their subjects. But
that’s not true for the disciples. If one of them wants to be great, then they
must become a servant to everyone. If they want to be first, they must become a
slave. The Son of Man came to serve, not be served. The Son of Man came to give
his life as a ransom for many.
One
commentator at WorkingPreacher.org said that folks get so caught up in this
last line in verse 45 that the rest of the story tends to get glossed over.
It’s a powerful image, indeed, to think of Jesus giving his life as a ransom
for ours; to understand that if we read this literally, Jesus buys back our
lives with his own.
But
what about that whole grasp for glory party at the beginning? How does that
relate to us? How does that raise conflict and tension in our understanding of
what it means to be disciples versus what it means to be successful?
I
realize it may be a stretch to make glory and success synonyms, but I think in
this case it fits. The disciples, especially as Mark portrays them, had to
battle their cultural understanding of the way things should be in contrast
with the way Jesus said they were. A messiah was supposed to be strong,
invincible, a warrior, someone who would come and whoop the oppressors.
Following that, the messiah meant greatness and it meant glory. It meant power.
Being the messiah should bring about praise and accolades. The messiah should
receive nothing but adoration, flattery, and subservience. But Jesus turns all
these cultural assumptions on their head.
The
Messiah has come to die. In his weakness, there will be strength. In his death
there will be life. He did not come to lead a great uprising or a bloody revolt.
His revolution comes in the form of love, and that love will turn the world
upside down. Jesus has come to make the love of God and the kingdom of God
visible. But guess what? That happens through suffering, through serving,
through humility, through death.
And
that whole bit about glory and greatness that the disciples seek? You want to
truly be great? You want true glory? Truly being great means being a servant, a
slave. You want to be first? Then you must be last.
None
of this is easy for the disciples to hear. And no matter how many times Jesus
told them the truth about being the messiah, that truth seemed incomprehensible,
and impossible to live out and live into. But let’s be honest, even though our
cultural contexts may be different, living out the truth of the gospel is no
easier for us. We are bombarded with the message that success and greatness
comes from being stronger and tougher and even more ruthless than everybody
else. We are inundated with the idea that those who are famous, who are
celebrities, who are power brokers and power influencers are the ones who are
supposed to be on top, and not the other way around.
In
our culture, much like the culture that Jesus and the disciples lived in, our
understanding of what it means to be successful is about winning and winning
and winning some more. Glory equates to fame and fortune and power. Glory is
something to strive for.
But
when James and John come to Jesus seeking glory, Jesus tells them once again
that they misunderstand what glory is and from where true glory comes. Gory is
found not in fame or fortune. Glory is not found in power. Glory is found in
the cup that he drinks. That cup holds the suffering and sorrow of the world.
That cup holds the ignominy of a criminal’s death. The cup that Jesus drinks is
the cup of death, but it is also the cup of life. James and John and the other
disciples will eventually drink from that cup. And they will be baptized with
the same baptism. But in this moment they don’t fully understand what it means.
Maybe they just don’t want to understand. But one day they will.
One
day they will understand that drinking from the same cup as Jesus means a life
turned upside down. It means taking a place at the end of the line, going last
so others can go first. It means serving others, not the other way around. It
means being willing to suffer and die. But it also means that death does not
have the final word. The cup that Jesus drinks is the cup of life, new life,
full life, true life. The cup that Jesus drinks is the cup of the gospel, the
cup of good news. Are we willing to drink from it too?
Let
all of God’s children say, “Alleluia.”
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment